Subject	2nd
Posted by	sfpearl300z on August 01, 2004 at 2:26 PM
	This message has been viewed 124 times.
In Reply To	then you dont need a TT much less an NA..just my .02 posted by TenneZee on July 29, 2004 at 11:50 PM
Message	144 for full coverage with my NA, similar record as Z_sick, except my accident was a "not-at-fault" and Im 19.
Follow Ups	Insurance rates - C_Sick 12:13:13 07/27/04 you have to understand there are many variables - ZLover4Life 17:02:48 07/27/04 True - Z_Sick 23:23:52 07/27/04 then you dont need a TT much less an NA..just my .02 - TenneZee 23:50:26 07/29/04 2nd - sfpearl300z 14:26:52 08/01/04 I had a 1990 NA - Z_Sick 01:15:42 07/31/04 $113/ month full coverage, but a I`m a 40 year old with - JERRY 14:05:35 08/02/04 106 month/ full coverage and 25 with clean record (n/m) - GodZilla(noVA) 12:53:20 08/03/04 I pay ~$100/month - Rob'Z 15:34:27 08/08/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.